Guinea. Economic analysis

The most important information for investor


Guinea analysis. Tax environment

   Guinea Economic

Tax risks: 4.00
Guinea has a small formal sector and therefore a narrow tax base. The main burden of taxation falls disproportionately on businesses, especially in the capital Conakry. Mining companies, for example, provide about 35% of government revenue. The Investment Code provides a number of tax incentives, but these are limited.

Tax Snap-Shot

Income Tax Rate
35
Minimum tax is 3% of turnover unless exempt.
Capital Tax Rate
35
This tax can be deferred if proceeds are reinvested.
Branch Tax Rate
35
Minimum tax is 3% of turnover unless exempt.
Withholding Tax
 
 
Dividends
15
 
Interest
20
 
Royalties from Patents, Know-how etc
10
Applicable to payments to non-residents.
Branch Remittance Tax
15
 
Net Operating Losses (Years)
Carryback
0
 
Carryward
3
 
Top Rate
45
 
VAT
18
Added to all sales of goods and services, imports and exports.
Import Tax
33
An import tax is levied on all imports. Guinea is not a member of the WEAMU.

source: Ernst & Young

Tax Environment

Tax is applied on the principle of territory, therefore Guinean companies carrying out operations outside of the country are not taxed. Compliance rates are low. The administration of the taxation system is poorly run, making enforcement of tax payments difficult.

Tax and Duty Rates

There are a large number of tax exemptions available to companies operating in Guinea, though the IMF has identified the incentives as a loophole that needs tightening up. The Investment Code (1987) sets out the framework of these incentives, which are processed through the National Investment Commission (CNI). There are five regimes:

  • High Priority Investments
    These are available to companies establishing in areas such as agricultural development, transport, tourism or telecommunications. Incentives include exemption from customs duties (for up to two years) and discounts on income tax on local employees.
  • Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
    In order to qualify for incentives under this regime, a company must have Guinean majority shareholding, fall within a 'high priority sector' and possess assets between Gfr15-300m. The regime provides exemption from minimum income tax for 10 years and a lower rate of tax on profits for five years.
  • Exporting Firms
    In order to be eligible for exporting firms' incentives, a company must operate within a 'high-priority sector', invest at least 33% of the investment in cash, export non-traditional Guinean produce (not including minerals) and export more than 22% of its turnover. The regime provides relief from corporate income tax on profits that are equal to the export total sales proportion for five years. The ceiling for this relief is 60%.
  • 'Value-Adding' Enterprises
    In order to qualify as a 'value-adding' firm, a company must operate within a 'high-priority sector', invest at least 33% of the investment in cash and at least 70% of the components (or goods) must be of Guinean origin. The main tax incentive is a 20% deduction from the taxable income on Guinean materials used for the first five years.
  • Enterprises in Less Developed Areas
    This incentive is designed to decentralise economic activity from the capital. For its purposes, Guinea is divided into two zones: Conakry and suburbs, and the rest of the country. Firms that establish outside Conakry are entitled to a five-year exemption from income tax and a reduction of one-third of turnover taxes, again for a five-year period.

Assessment

The Guinean tax system has been identified for upgrading and overhauling under the direction of the IMF. There are currently thought to be too many loopholes, which, rather than attracting investment to Guinea, is cutting the state off from a potential source of revenue. Measures are in the pipeline to broaden the tax base and strengthen the administration of the tax system, which is being computerised. Public companies are among those being investigated for non-payment of substantial tax payments and have even been found to have forged tax payments. In early 2001, authorities uncovered a conspiracy involving the employees of the tax directorate, the Central Bank and some commercial banks, who had colluded to defraud the government of taxes paid by businesses. Tax funds were diverted to the private bank accounts of those involved, with losses estimated to be in the region of US$1.5m. Those involved were hauled up before the authorities and a full investigation was launched to ensure that any similar fraud would not happen again.

© 2003 World Markets Research Centre. All rights reserved. Important Notice